![]() There is certainly an initial learning curve but its no where as steep as FB2K's. MJ's not as resource light as FB2k, but it's database is faster i think than FB2k. Tagging is a breeze here and you are not forced to store anything in the files, everything can be stored just in the app's library. You can do panes in FB2K but its no way as easy and therefore usable. The hierachical file explorer view breaks down and panes is much more scalable. That i would say is the main reason you need to look for something better. ![]() MJ or the pay versoin ( MC) is what you graduate to when FB2k/winamp/itunes/WMP don't cut it anymore ie very good with *LARGE* collections. Foobar2000 can natively play ASX/MMS/RTSP streams. Built-in support for Windows Media streaming. Browsing a site like DeviantArt will give you hundreds of skins (that have been made by other users) to choose from. What about organisation, management & ease of use ?įB2K is a player, period !, a light, good player, it has mgmt capability but no where close to what i suggested.īottom line: if you got less than a few thousand files, stick with what you got, almost any player will get the job done. When comparing foobar2000 vs VLC, the Slant community recommends VLC for most people. If thats important to you, then Foobar isnt for you. You dont need to use stolen source code for that. Is resource light and does what its setup to do, just play! Foorbar is a no frills player for you no frills, I mean no UI. Reply 1 19:29:40 Are you a troll Winamp skins are just images. has all the settings you want and nothing more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |